From Compute to Capacity: Why AI Infrastructure Spending May Reshape the SMID-Cap Opportunity
How hyperscaler spending is creating a fundamental earnings-cycle case for small- and mid-cap stocks.
Model Illustration: The 20–44% SMID-cap and approximately 1.6% large-cap stock-price-impact figures discussed below are hypothetical estimates from an illustrative $1 billion incremental-revenue model, not realized investment returns. They depend on the model assumptions described in the linked white paper.
The AI opportunity is moving from chips to capacity
Mega-cap technology companies initially dominated AI investment through platform development and model training. However, as AI spending accelerates, the opportunity is broadening toward the physical infrastructure required to bring compute online.
White Paper
From Compute to Capacity: A Real SMID Opportunity
Download the full white paper for detailed analysis on how AI infrastructure spending is creating fundamental earnings-cycle opportunities for small- and mid-cap companies.
Download Our White Paper (PDF)How big is AI infrastructure spending?
Hyperscalers — Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Oracle, and Meta — collectively spend hundreds of billions annually on data centers, chips, networking, power systems, and supporting infrastructure. Approximately 50% of real U.S. GDP growth in 2025 was attributable to AI spending.
The data center vacancy rate sits around 1%, with the pipeline largely pre-committed. AI capital expenditure is flowing into land acquisition, substations, transformers, switchgear, generators, cooling systems, fiber connectivity, construction labor, and grid interconnection.
What are the biggest bottlenecks?
Primary constraints include power and grid access, where interconnection queues stretch multiple years; skilled labor shortages, as every gigawatt requires thousands of workers; and electrical and thermal infrastructure, since the majority of data center investment flows outside GPU and CPU hardware into networking, power distribution, backup power, thermal management, land, and buildings.
Why might SMID-cap stocks benefit more than large caps?
Large-cap indices concentrate in the hyperscalers and semiconductor providers funding AI capital expenditure. SMID indices have greater representation in industrial, electrical, construction, materials, energy, and infrastructure businesses executing the physical buildout.
A $1 billion revenue opportunity creates 20–44% stock-price impact for SMID companies versus approximately 1.6% for large caps. This asymmetry makes the infrastructure phase of AI potentially more significant for small and mid-cap investors.
Are investors already paying peak prices?
No. SMID allocations have declined over two decades, valuations trade at significant discounts to large caps, and fund flows remain historically depressed. This creates a compelling setup for active managers with deep expertise in the space.
Conclusion
“The first phase of AI rewarded ownership of compute. The next phase may reward ownership of capacity.” This shift potentially creates a favorable environment for SMID companies, with opportunity broadening from models to infrastructure.
Read the full analysis
Download our white paper for the complete research behind this thesis.
Download PDFGet insights from the 5Perspectives Growth team.
Receive commentaries, perspectives, and research from this investment team directly in your inbox.
Important Disclosures: This information has been prepared by Polen Capital without taking into account individual objectives, financial situations or needs. As such, it is for informational purposes only and is not to be relied on as legal, tax, business, investment, accounting, or any other advice. Recipients should seek their own independent financial advice. Investing involves inherent risks, and any particular investment is not suitable for all investors; there is always a risk of losing part or all of your invested capital.
No statement herein should be interpreted as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security (including, but not limited to, any investment vehicle or separate account managed by Polen Capital). This information is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
Unless otherwise stated, any statements and/or information contained herein is as of the date represented above, and the receipt of this information at any time thereafter will not create any implication that the information and/or statements are made as of any subsequent date. Certain information contained herein is derived from third parties beyond Polen Capital's control or verification and involves significant elements of subjective judgment and analysis. While efforts have been made to ensure the quality and reliability of the information herein, there may be limitations, inaccuracies, or new developments that could impact the accuracy of such information. Therefore, the information contained herein is not guaranteed to be accurate or timely and does not claim to be complete. Polen Capital reserves the right to supplement or amend this content at any time but has no obligation to provide the recipient with any supplemental, amended, replacement or additional information.
Any statements made by Polen Capital regarding future events or expectations are forward-looking statements and are based on current assumptions and expectations. Such statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and are not a reliable indicator of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied.
There is no assurance that any securities discussed herein are currently held in a Polen Capital portfolio nor that they are representative of the entire portfolio in which they are or were held. It should not be assumed that any transactions related to the securities discussed herein were (or will prove to be) profitable or that any future transactions will equal the investment performance of the securities discussed herein.
References to specific securities, asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations.
The Global Industry Classification Standard (“GICS”) was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. (“MSCI”) and Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“S&P”) and is licensed for use by Polen Capital Management, LLC. Neither MSCI, S&P nor any third party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such standard or classification (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such standard or classification. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, S&P, any of their affiliates or any third party involved in making or compiling the GICS or any GICS classifications have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
This information may not be redistributed and/or reproduced without the prior written permission of Polen Capital.
Please see full disclosures in the white paper.