Commentary

2Q 2026 Focus Growth Commentary

Polen Capital's Focus Growth portfolio returned +6.33% (net) in Q2 2026 as a narrow, AI-infrastructure-driven rally rewarded semiconductors while software and healthcare lagged. The team initiated six new positions spanning aerospace, power infrastructure, and semiconductors, sharpening its focus on business momentum and opportunity cost.

The Polen Focus Growth Composite Portfolio returned +6.33% (net of fees) in the second quarter of 2026, compared to +16.74% for the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The source of the gap was specific: a narrow, momentum-driven rally concentrated in AI infrastructure beneficiaries — particularly semiconductors and memory-related businesses — rewarded near-term acceleration while penalizing the software, IT services, and healthcare companies where the portfolio has historically found high-quality, recurring-revenue businesses. Semiconductors now represent roughly one-third of the Russell 1000 Growth Index, approximately four to five times their weighting just a few years ago.

In response, the team made its most active quarter of portfolio changes in recent memory, initiating six new positions and exiting five, with a clear objective: redeploy capital toward companies with stronger current business momentum, competitive advantages, and visible long-term demand tailwinds.

Read the full Q2 2026 Focus Growth portfolio manager commentary.

What Drove the Market in Q2 2026?

The dominant feature of the quarter was not that growth stocks rallied, but that the rally remained narrow and momentum-driven. Investors focused on supply bottlenecks, accelerating demand for compute, and the capital intensity required to support generative and agentic AI. Businesses associated with these themes attracted capital in a self-reinforcing cycle, while companies without obvious thematic associations remained under pressure regardless of their underlying fundamentals. The team observed that temporary slowdowns were priced as permanent impairments, while temporary bottlenecks in favored areas were extrapolated as enduring advantages.

Which Holdings Contributed Most — and Least — to Performance?

Lam Research led the portfolio as investors rewarded its leadership in wafer fabrication equipment at a time of acute AI-driven semiconductor demand. Eli Lilly and the decision not to own Netflix also contributed positively. On the other side, CoStar Group continued to weigh on performance as the market focused on elevated Homes.com spending and the timeline for margin recovery, while Zoetis lagged amid competitive pressure in companion animal dermatology.

How Is the Team Repositioning the Portfolio?

The quarter's activity reflected a deliberate shift. The team sold positions in Accenture, Aon, Synopsys, Uber, and Zoetis — all high-quality businesses where growth had either slowed or become more difficult to sustain — and initiated positions in ATI Inc., EMCOR Group, GE Aerospace, GE Vernova, Howmet Aerospace, and TSMC. The team also added to NVIDIA at a valuation it considered attractive relative to the company's earnings growth.

The new holdings share common characteristics: concentrated industry structures, supply-constrained environments, and multi-year demand visibility driven by aerospace aftermarket cycles, data center construction, power infrastructure needs, and leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing.

Key Takeaways

The rally was narrow and momentum-driven.

Semiconductor and AI infrastructure businesses drove the bulk of index returns, and the Russell 1000 Growth Index now has roughly one-third of its weight in semiconductors.

The team executed its most active quarter in recent memory.

Six new positions were initiated across aerospace, power infrastructure, and semiconductors, while five holdings were sold where near-term growth had slowed.

The team is finding quality growth in less obvious places.

Beyond AI infrastructure, new positions in commercial aerospace and power generation reflect concentrated industry structures, long-duration backlogs, and supply-demand imbalances that may support durable earnings growth for years.

Learn more about the Quality Growth franchise

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How did the Polen Focus Growth strategy perform in Q2 2026?

Q: How did the Polen Focus Growth strategy perform in Q2 2026? The portfolio returned +6.33% net of fees in Q2 2026, compared to +16.74% for the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The portfolio generated positive absolute returns but lagged due to a narrow, momentum-driven rally concentrated in AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks.

Q: Why did Focus Growth underperform the Russell 1000 Growth Index in Q2 2026?

Q: Why did Focus Growth underperform the Russell 1000 Growth Index in Q2 2026? The relative shortfall was driven by a market that aggressively rewarded near-term AI infrastructure beneficiaries — particularly memory and semiconductor businesses — while penalizing software, IT services, and healthcare companies where the portfolio held meaningful positions. Semiconductors now represent roughly one-third of the Index.

Q: What new positions did Focus Growth add in Q2 2026?

Q: What new positions did Focus Growth add in Q2 2026? The team initiated positions in ATI Inc., EMCOR Group, GE Aerospace, GE Vernova, Howmet Aerospace, and TSMC. Each new holding operates in a concentrated industry structure with supply constraints and multi-year demand visibility. The team also added to its existing NVIDIA position.

Q: How is Polen Capital adapting its Focus Growth approach to the current market?

Q: How is Polen Capital adapting its Focus Growth approach to the current market? The team is placing greater emphasis on business momentum and opportunity cost while preserving its core approach of owning competitively advantaged businesses. Capital is being redeployed more actively toward companies with stronger near-term growth dynamics and visible demand tailwinds across AI infrastructure, aerospace, and power infrastructure.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. The commentary is not intended as a guarantee of profitable outcomes. Please see Important Disclosures in the full commentary.